FACTS:
Alice Reyes Van Dorn, a Filipino Citizen and private
respondent, Richard Upton, a US citizen, was married in Hong Kong in
1979. They established their residence in the Philippines and had 2
children. They were divorced in Nevada, USA in 1982 and petitioner
remarried, this time with Theodore Van Dorn. A suit against petitioner
was filed on June 8, 1983, stating that petitioner’s business in Ermita Manila,
the Galleon Shop, is a conjugal property with Upton and prayed therein that
Alice be ordered to render an accounting of the business and he be declared as
the administrator of the said property.
ISSUE: Whether or not the foreign divorce between the petitioner and private
respondent in Nevada is binding in the Philippines where petitioner is a
Filipino citizen.
HELD:
Private respondent is no longer the husband of the
petitioner. He would have no standing to sue petitioner to exercise
control over conjugal assets. He is estopped by his own representation
before the court from asserting his right over the alleged conjugal
property. Furthermore, aliens may obtain divorces abroad, which may be
recognized in the Philippines, provided they are valid according to their
national law. Petitioner is not bound to her marital obligations to
respondent by virtue of her nationality laws. She should not be
discriminated against her own country if the end of justice is to be served.
No comments:
Post a Comment