FACTS:
In 1961, accused was granted an appointment as
secret agent of Governor Leviste. In 1965, accused was charged with illegal
possession of firearms. The SC held that where at the time of his appointment,
People v. Macarandang (1959) was applicable, which held that secret agents were
exempt from the license requirement, and later People v. Mapa (1967) was
decided, the earlier case should be held applicable.
HELD:
HELD:
Art. 8 of the Civil Code decrees that judicial decisions applying or
interpreting the laws or the Constitution form part of this jurisdiction's
legal system. These decisions, although in them¬selves not law, constitute
evidence of what the laws mean. The application or interpretation placed by the
courts upon a law is part of the law as of the date of the enactment of the
said law since the Court's application or interpretation merely establishes the
contemporaneous legislative intent that the construed law purports to carry
into effect.
A new doctrine abrogating an old rule operates prospectively and should not adversely affect those favored by the old rule.
A new doctrine abrogating an old rule operates prospectively and should not adversely affect those favored by the old rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment