Facts:
During the period pertinent to this case, petitioner corporation was engaged in
the business of telecasting local as well as foreign films acquired from foreign corporations not engaged in trade or
business within the
Philippines. for which petitioner paid rentals after withholding income tax of
30%of one-half of the film rentals. In implementing Section 4(b) of the Tax
Code, the Commissioner issued General Circular V-334. Pursuant thereto, ABS-CBN
Broadcasting Corp. dutifully withheld and turned over to the BIR 30% of ½ of
the film rentals paid by it to foreign corporations not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines. The last year that
the company withheld taxes pursuant to the Circular was in 1968. On 27 June
1908, RA 5431 amended Section 24 (b) of the Tax Code increasing the tax rate from 30% to 35% and revising the tax
basis from “such amount” referring to rents, etc. to “gross income.” In 1971,
the Commissioner issued a letter of assessment and demand for deficiency
withholding income
tax for years 1965 to
1968. The company requested for reconsideration; where the Commissioner did not
act upon.
Issue:
Whether Revenue Memorandum Circular 4-71, revoking General Circular V-334, may
be retroactively applied.
Held:
Rulings or circulars promulgated by the Commissioner have no retroactive
application where to so apply them
would be prejudicial to taxpayers. Herein ,the prejudice the company of the
retroactive application of Memorandum Circular 4-71 is beyond question. It was
issued only in 1971, or three years after 1968, the last year that petitioner
had withheld taxes under General Circular No. V-334. The assessment and demand
on petitioner to pay deficiency withholding income tax was also made three
years after 1968 for a period of time commencing in 1965. The company was no
longer in a position to withhold taxes due from foreign corporations because it had already
remitted all film rentals and had no longer control over them when the new
circular was issued. Insofar as the enumerated exceptions are concerned, the
company does not fall under any of them.
DISCLAIMER: THIS IS JUST A PART OF THE COMPILATION OF CASE DIGESTS I HAVE SEEN IN THE WWW. CREDITS TO THE ONE WHO MADE THIS. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment